[< BACK]
// POSTED: May 4, 2026

Technical Product Marketer, Content &amp; Growth (1 to 4 Years, Remote)

APPLY NOW

Technical Product Marketer — Content & Growth

Location: Remote (Worldwide)
 Type: Full-time
 Level: Junior to Mid-level (2 – 4 years experience)
 Reports to: Leadership team


About Clyro

Clyro is the Agent Kernel — the intelligent infrastructure layer that makes AI agents production-ready. We provide runtime governance for AI agents: loop detection, cost bounds, step limits, and business logic guardrails that prevent failures before they happen.

We're post-launch with early users, a live PLG funnel, and growing developer attention. AI agent deployment jumped from 11% to 42% in a single quarter — but 80% of organizations are experiencing risky agent behaviors. We've built the reliability infrastructure this market needs, and now we're scaling the go-to-market engine around it.

The Role

We've already built momentum , a library of published technical articles, an active content pipeline, a rolling editorial calendar, SEO keywords mapped, and a content quality pipeline designed.  What we don't have is someone dedicated to sustaining that momentum and scaling output.

You'll own the content-to-distribution pipeline end-to-end: take drafted articles through quality review, optimize for SEO, publish to our Ghost blog, distribute via newsletter and social media, and measure what's working. Then you'll build the engine that produces 2+ pieces per week sustainably.

This is a ground-floor role — pre-revenue, post MVP. You'll have direct access to the leadership team, real influence on how Clyro shows up publicly, and meaningful ownership from day one.

What You'll Do

Content Pipeline Execution (50%)

SEO & Growth (20%)

Email & Newsletter (15%)

Social Distribution (15%)

You Might Be a Fit If

Nice to Have

What We Provide


How to Apply

Please send:

  1. A brief note on why this role interests you

  2. 1–2 writing samples (B2B/technical content preferred)

  3. A short editorial critique (3–5 sentences) of the paragraph below what you’d change, keep, and why:

Observability tools are architecturally designed to record, not to intervene. They sit alongside the execution pipeline, receiving events as they happen, storing them for later analysis. They do not sit in the execution pipeline with the authority to stop it. Consider three real-world failure patterns where observability was present but damage still occurred: The $47K Loop. An autonomous multi-agent system entered a retry spiral over an unsolvable edge case and ran for eleven days, accumulating $47,000 in API costs. The system had monitoring. Cost alerts were configured at the account level a monthly budget alarm at $5,000 that was designed for normal operations. The agent's status logs 

Interested in this role?Apply on iHire